Battlefield 4: Second Assault: Video Review

We haven’t thought about Battlefield 4 for a long time. Its launch was not the most successful, but a lot of time has passed since then, and two DLCs have appeared. Let’s take a look at how the game has changed over these months and what the new downloadable content is like.

Battlefield 4: Second Assault

Best comments

I know that I will be downvoted, but I can’t say. Dear Alexandra Cost. Why do you always write the same text as you say??? Each of your reviews is signed exactly like the first words from this review! Why is it so hard to come up with something else??

Regarding this dls and all dls in general. I don’t understand what path the game developers chose. We are forced to pay for the same thing (or for something new, it doesn’t matter)! what is "%*? Previously, if a game was released, it had a lot of content, and all content released later was absolutely free. Same maps, guns, monsters. All this has always been free! And now I buy the 4th battle for 1199 rubles and still have to pay 10-20 bucks for fucking 3 cards?? No, I understand if there were 3 new single companies, 100 guns and 20 cards. BUT they also ask for money for “this”?! There are simply no words. We’re completely screwed!

I still play the third part, I didn’t buy the fourth one on principle, there’s no point in putting a good series on the assembly line!

No, it happens. Kolda showed that this https://nodepositbonuscasinos.co.uk/review/spin-time/ path does not lead to anything good, there was once an excellent series, but when they started constantly churning out the same thing after each other, it lost all its charm. I don’t know about you, but I personally really don’t want battlefield to suffer the same fate… :/

I completely agree. Although, in fact, BF was always released at intervals of 1-2 years. But still, there was a difference of 5-6 years between the numbered parts.
Well, EA’s policies don’t appeal either. They cut the game even before release and sell premiums more expensive than the game itself (which, by the way, itself costs quite a bit).

Obviously if you think about it
The third part of Battlefield is a full-fledged project
And the fourth is most likely just an ad-don..
Sasha Cost was right.

In fact, I’m just glad that the servers are empty, because this is the only way to convey to investors the idea that the series Battlefield no need to place on conveyor rails type "feces, ofduti". We need to continue making fundamentally new parts as we have done throughout the entire series before this
(not counting BC 1 and 2, but the first one was not on PC so this can be considered an excuse)

The 3rd battle was a breakthrough in many areas (visually, technically, scale) in general it was a collapse of the tower. And there was no question about purchasing premium! And then the 4th part came out and immediately caused rejection (why the hell so early, if you consider that we played the 3rd part for more than a year, it turns out that the new part appeared in less than a year) Well, I bought it without much enthusiasm, but it’s a battle! And what did I see there? reduced maps, simplifications, bugs, lags, the advertised left-handedness got boring after the 3rd time, the commander mode is useless crap, and all this is seasoned with the secondary nature of the process (and there were improvements, for example), what a bonus I’m still reproaching myself for picking up this game, no, I play it sometimes, but it stuck with me, the thrill that the 3rd part gave me is not even close!

I looked at the review, but for me BF4 is not as clear as BF3. Let’s see what time and new dlc show, as well as the policies of DICE and EA regarding current/future battles.

Very aptly noted, the third part was truly a new step in the development of the battlefield series, absorbing all the best from the previous parts and raising it to a completely new qualitative level.

I also don’t like it when you read the description of a video, and then the first 20 seconds of the video repeat this description.

I had mixed feelings about the fourth battle, because of the marine component I really liked it, but in the first months on Windows 8 there were so many problems that… in short, it’s not clear.
But in fact, if it weren’t for naval battles, the fourth battle would definitely resemble an improved version of the third, which is what this review actually confirmed.

Comments

comments